Tag: power

  • On Fairness, Difference, and the Refusal to Flatten

    Life will never be fair — and it never should be.

    Fairness implies sameness. But life is not a courtroom, and humans are not equal vessels. Even if everyone were returned to the same baseline — the same resources, the same starting point — sameness would never hold. Difference is not learned; it is emergent.

    Attempts to flatten difference do not erase hierarchy; they distort it. When contrast is forcibly suppressed, it sharpens underground. Artificial sameness produces exaggerated division, harsher and more brittle than the natural variance it tries to deny.

    You see this lie everywhere.

    “Everyone is beautiful,” people say — until someone is told, you’re beautiful like that obese woman. The recoil is instant. Suddenly, beauty was never about perception. It was a moral placeholder. A word emptied of content so no one has to confront taste, preference, or desire.

    When people say “everyone is equal” but still sort, rank, desire, exclude, envy, and elevate — what they’re really doing is lying about the mechanism while still obeying it. That lie breeds resentment.

    Let ugly be a thing.
    Let beauty be a thing.

    Let mediocrity exist exactly as it is — but never confuse it with excellence. Not out of cruelty, but out of respect for truth. Acknowledging this is not my lane is not self-rejection; it is maturity. Not every space is meant to hold everyone, and not every contribution is inherently valuable simply because it exists.

    Exclusivity has a function. So does rarity. So does discernment. When everything is declared equally valuable, value itself dissolves into noise. Participation trophies do not protect anyone; they only muddy clarity — and clarity is not violence.

    A simple example: I have no literary talent. I would never call myself a writer. I struggle with coherence, I’m naturally clumsy with language, and writing does not come to me with ease. I use tools — including ChatGPT — to refine my word choices and structure because I am, at best, mediocre at this craft.

    Why deny it? Why sugarcoat it?

    Do I feel shame about it? No.
    Do I think I’m entitled to praise or to be called “talented” when there’s nothing to justify it? Absolutely not.

    My worth is not dependent on my ability to write. And I won’t disrespect the literary world by inserting myself into it under a title I haven’t earned. That doesn’t diminish me — it clarifies me.

    And yet, despite the lack of talent, I have perspectives to share. So here I am. Not as a writer, but as an author of my own thoughts — using whatever tools are necessary to say them clearly.

    So find your lane. And if it does not exist yet, build it. Stop demanding entry into spaces that were never meant to contain you – that’s so energetically cheap.

    Be a work in progress without self-contempt.
    Be above average without guilt, don’s feel sorry for the mediocres.

    And stop running away from yourself.

  • If you care about the world you live in, be fucking rich

    people keep saying money and power are the problem. i’ve never believed that. the problem has always been where they land.

    i care about the world. genuinely. and because i care, i’m careful about not giving my power away — not to guilt, not to shame, not to the performance of being small so other people can feel morally clean. i’m not interested in sounding good while nothing moves.

    i care about the ability to say yes without asking for permission. the ability to fund, protect, exit, support, preserve. the ability to move things instead of narrating how immovable they are.

    money and power aren’t corrupting by default. they just amplify whoever is holding them. so yes, i want them in the hands of people who actually care.

    i want to give more to the causes i care about — stopping wars, stopping genocides, protecting children, education, supporting artists and artisans, preserving traditional crafts and artisan communities, preserving culture without freezing it into museums or turning it into pity projects. keeping things alive, funded, and intact.

    none of that happens because someone writes a beautiful paragraph about how powerless they feel. none of it happens because we collectively agree that wanting money is shallow. it happens because someone has enough leverage to write checks, build infrastructure, hire people, fund exits, and keep going without burning out.

    the whole “i’m broke but morally pure” thing is not working. it’s not noble. it’s not sustainable. and it’s definitely not helping the people it claims to center. some of us who care have to be rich — obscenely rich, tactically rich, rich enough to not have to ask, explain, or beg. rich enough to absorb hits and keep moving. rich enough to make long-term commitments instead of one-off gestures.

    and yes — i love material things. i love shopping. i love beautiful objects. i love excess when it’s intentional. i’m a slut for it. handbags, clothes, texture, shine. flame me if you need to. i’m not here to be ascetic. i’m here to do things my way.

    i don’t want to spend my life whining about how powerless i am. i want to spend it being useful.

    i’m not embarrassed about wanting money. i’m embarrassed by how many people pretend they don’t, while quietly resenting those who do something with it. this isn’t about accumulation for its own sake. it’s about custody — about who gets to hold power, and whether they do anything decent with it.

    some people turn caring into a performance. i turn it into capacity.

    special thanks to Paris Hilton.


    that’s hot.

  • please stop calling me feminine

    just thoughts i’m not interested in sanding down.

    this might sound dramatic, but i genuinely hate the word feminine. honestly, i hate that it’s even a word. i don’t know what function it serves now other than telling people with female bodies how to be women correctly — how to behave, soften, present, sacrifice, and somehow still make it look effortless. how to be palatable. how to be sold more things while being tied tighter to a narrative that was never built for our benefit in the first place.

    i miss when these things were just energy, not instructions:

    feminine as yin — retractive, void, cold, darkness over light, rest, subconscious. masculine as yang — expansive, heat, light over darkness, action, consciousness. two halves of the same whole, constantly shaping each other, ebbing and flowing. not separate. not ranked. that’s what actually creates life. humans have always been dual beings. all of us. always.

    somewhere along the way, energy turned into identity. identity turned into expectation. and expectation turned into something you get corrected or punished for not performing correctly. that’s usually where i check out.

    i’m exhausted by the question “what does it mean to be a woman,” especially because it pretends to be neutral when it’s not. it’s never just a question. it comes with an expectation of tone, of warmth, of reassurance. you’re supposed to answer it cheerfully, relationally, in a way that signals you belong. like “woman” is a coat you have to prove you deserve to wear, even though you were born in it.

    there is nothing neutral about that word. it comes with moral add-ons. emotional labor. an unspoken obligation to be nice, giving, friendly, communal, uplifting. and if you don’t perform those things naturally enough, you start to feel like you’re doing womanhood wrong. i’m not interested in playing that game.

    i don’t experience womanhood as a philosophy. i experience it as a set of conditions i live inside. so when people ask me what it means to me, what comes out isn’t poetry or solidarity or something sweet and reassuring. it’s much more literal than that.

    i like being alone. i like shopping. i like being pretty. i like being smart. i enjoy it when I’m prettier and smarter than others. it’s power, duh. i’m not pretending i don’t see it, and i don’t let it defines me either.

    i’m not strong enough to live without beauty, curation, and meaning; that’s the truth. i need shape. i need intention. i need things to feel deliberate or i start to rot. so no, i’m not interested in pretending i’m above being vain, and i’m not interested in being shamed for needing it either.

    if power lands in your lap, why reject it? and who actually benefits when you do? abandoning power doesn’t make you virtuous, it just makes you easier to erase. self-denial has never redistributed anything. it just convinces people with less leverage to give up what little they have and call it ethics.

    i don’t believe in restraint as morality. i don’t believe in humility as proof of goodness. i don’t believe in shrinking myself so the room feels fairer. i believe in leverage, and i believe in being honest about when you have it.

    this is also why i feel deeply uncomfortable with how some versions of femininity get performed now, especially the whole “baby”, “little girl” thing. calling yourself a baby. really? a strategy built on being manageable. docile. non-threatening. that’s not yin. that’s compliance dressed up as cuteness. once something is rewarded, repeated, and aimed at a specific audience, it stops being innocent self-expression and becomes strategy. you ain’t sly.

    what unsettles me most is how desirability gets tied to childlike traits — helplessness, needing protection, being small — and sold as aspirational for adult women. i care about children. i’m a big sister. i understand what protection is supposed to mean. blurring that line for attention doesn’t feel empowering to me, and i’m not going to pretend it does just to be polite.

    this same allergy shows up when people try to neatly label desire. i’m bi-ish. always have been. but it’s never felt like something i need to announce or perform. i don’t debate it. i don’t justify it. i don’t feel the need to explain how i got here. i know who i’m drawn to, and i don’t have anything to prove about it.

    labels flatten things that are alive. they turn energy into admin. and i don’t want to begin interactions by handing people instructions on how to read me, then spend the rest of the time maintaining that reading.

    i’ve felt left out most of my life, not because i didn’t try hard enough to belong, but because the cost of inclusion was always dilution. sanding myself down. softening edges. making myself easier to absorb.

    so i opted out. deliberately. i built an interior world strong enough to anchor me without a community, because forced inclusion smells like pity and i’m too proud to accept it.

    i don’t want to be categorized.
    i want to be met.